Document Type
Book Chapter
Publication Date
2021
Journal Title or Book Title
The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy
Version
Post-Print
Publisher's Statement
Authors whose work is accepted for publication in a non-open access Springer or Palgrave Macmillan book are permitted to self-archive the accepted manuscript (AM) chapter or section, on their own personal website and/or in their funder or institutional repositories, for public release after an embargo period (see the table below). The accepted manuscript is the version of the book manuscript accepted for publication after peer review, but prior to copyediting and typesetting. Accepted Manuscript Terms of Use Use of archived accepted manuscripts (AMs) of non open-access books and chapters are subject to an embargo period and our AM terms of use, which permit users to view, print, copy, download and text and data-mine the content, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full conditions of use. Under no circumstances may the AM be shared or distributed under a Creative Commons, or other form of open access license, nor may it be reformatted or enhanced. © 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_38-1
Abstract
This chapter explores the comedy of George Carlin (1937–2008) as a powerful statement about the value of truth over ignorance. Carlin challenged his audience to confront the truth, regularly using clever rhetorical strategies to force viewers to grapple with inconvenient realities about the world in which they lived. This chapter examines historical and contemporary philosophical arguments for the importance of the pursuing truth over comforting fictions. I begin with Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, which argues it is preferable to know reality as it truly is over appearances of the truth, even when it’s painful or difficult. I then discuss Nozick’s argument that humans would not want to plug into a pleasurable experience machine. Last, I examine contemporary arguments that there are distinctly moral reasons for pursuing the truth. I show how there are examples of all three arguments in Carlin’s comedic work, and suggest we can consider Carlin’s work a critical commentary that reveals multiple reasons for valuing truth over enticing fictions.
Related Pillar(s)
Study
Recommended Citation
Engels, Kimberly S. PhD, "George Carlin as Philosophy: It’s All Bullshit. Is It Bad for Ya?" (2021). Faculty Works: PHI (2010-2021). 5.
https://digitalcommons.molloy.edu/phil_fac/5
Comments
Book title: The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy
Book doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6
Editors: David Kyle Johnson, Dean A. Kowalski, Chris Lay, Kimberly S. Engels
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97134-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97134-6